ISSN 2071-8594

Russian academy of sciences

Editor-in-Chief

Gennady Osipov

G. S. Osipov, D.A. Devyatkin, Y.M. Kuznetsova, A.V. Shvets Possibilities of intellectual analysis of scientific texts by construction of their cognitive models

Abstract.

The paper provides a study of cognitive structures of scientific texts within the framework of the activity paradigm. We define mental actions as actions that are aimed at constructing new or reconstructing already existing abstract objects. We consider mental operations as forms of an implementation of mental actions, which are typical for scientific communication. It is shown that mental operations form the cognitive structure of the scientific text. The study revealed the theoretical possibility of inferring a model of the cognitive structure of a scientific text. A formal representation of the mental operations used for the action "description of a new phenomenon for science" is proposed.

Keywords:

scientific text, cognitive model, mental operations, representation for mental operations.

PP. 41-53.

References

1. Trusov V.E. Svoeobrazie definicii v razlichnyh funkcionalnyh stilyah kak raznovidnostyah tipov myshleniya na materiale nauchnogo i hudozhestvennogo stilej [The peculiarity of the definition in various functional styles as varieties of types of thinking (on the basis of scientific and artistic styles)]. –Diss kand filol nauk [PhD theses]. Saratov. 2008.
2. Ispiryan A.V. Nauchnyj diskurs kak raznovidnost institucionalnogo obshheniya [Scientific discourse as a kind of institutional communication]// E.F. Karskij i sovremennoe yazykoznanie. materialy XII mezhdunar nauch chtenij [Proceedings of the XII Internationals Readings]. Grodno. GRGU. 2011. p. 427-433.
3. Kotyurova M.P., Bazhenova E. A. Kultura nauchnoj rechi. Tekst i ego redaktirovanie [Culture of scientific speech. Text and editing], M. Flinta. 2008.
4. Krizhanovskaya E.M. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskaya struktura nauchnogo teksta [Communicatively-pragmatic structure of scientific text]. Dis kand filol nauk [PhD theses]. Perm. .2000.
5. Pumpyanskij A.L. Vvedenie v praktiku perevoda nauchnoj i tekhnicheskoj literatury na anglijskij yazyk [Introduction to the practice of translating scientific and engineering literature into English].M. Nauka. 1965.
6. Salimovskij V.A. Zhanry rechi v funkcionalno-stilisticheskom osveshhenii russkij akademicheskij tekst [Speech genres in functional-stylistic coverage of Russian academic text]. Diss dok filol nauk [Dr. Sci theses]. Ekaterinburg. 2002.
7. Chernyavskaya V. E. Kommunikaciya v nauke: normativnoe i deviantnoe. Lingvisticheskij i sociokulturnyj analiz [Communication in science: normative and deviant. Linguistic and sociocultural analysis]. M. Knizhnyj dom. Librokom. 2011.
8. Vladimirova T.L. Yazyk i stil nauchnogo teksta [Language and style of scientific text]. – Tomsk. Izd-vo tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2010.
9. Bolshakova E.I., Baeva N.V. Avtomaticheskij analiz diskursivnoj struktury nauchnogo teksta [Automatic analysis of the discursive structure of scientific text]// Trudy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii po kompyuternoj lingvistike Dialog-2004 [In Proceedings Dialog-2004]. M. 2004.
10. Bolshakova E.I., Vasileva N. Eh. Formalizaciya Leksiko-sintaksicheskoj informacii dlya raspoznavaniya regulyarnyh konstrukcij estestvennogo yazyka [Formalization of lexico-syntactic information for recognition of regular constructions of natural language]. – Programmnye produkty [Software]. 2008.
11. Bolshakova E.I., Vasileva N.Eh., Morozov S.S. Leksiko-sintaksicheskie shablony dlya avtomaticheskogo analiza nauchnotekhnicheskih tekstov [Lexico-syntactic templates for automatic analysis of scientific and engineering texts]// Tr desyatoj nacion konf po iskusstven intel s mezhdunar uchast. KII-2006 [In Proceedings KII-2006]. M. Fizmatlit. 2006. Vol. 2 p. 506-524.
12. Sohor A.M. Logicheskaya struktura uchebnogo materiala// Voprosy didakticheskogo analiza. M. Prosveshhenie, 1974.
13. Doblaev L.P. Analiz i ponimanie teksta [Analysis and understanding of the text]. Saratov. – Saratovskij gos un-t., 1987.
14. Chistyakova G.D. Psihologicheskoe issledovanie soderzhatelnoj struktury teksta v svyazi s problemoj ponimaniya [Psychological research of the content structure of the text in connection with the problem of understanding]. Vopr psihologii [Questions of Psychology]. 1974. (4). p. 115-127.
15. Novikov A.I. Semantika teksta i ee formalizaciya [Semantics of the text and its formalization]. M. Nauka, 1983.
16. Tunkel V.D. K voprosu ob ustnoj peredache rechevogo soobshheniya [On the issue of oral transmission of a voice message]. Diss kand ped nauk [PhD theses]. M. 1965.
17. Dridze T.M. Tekstovaya deyatelnost v strukture socialnoj kommunikacii [Text activity in the structure of social communication]. M. Nauka. 1984.
18. Kolker Ya.M. Analiz teksta putem vydeleniya kommunikativnyh blokov s oporoj na kommunikativnye bloki kak odin iz priemov proverki ego bolshej ili menshej dostupnosti dlya vospriyatiya [Text analyzing the by highlighting communication blocks as one of the methods for checking its greater or less accessibility for perception]// Smyslovoe vospriyatie rechevogo soobshheniya v usloviyah massovoj kommunikacii [The semantic perception of a voice message in a mass communication environment]. Izdatelstvo Nauka. 1976. p 73-77.
19. Belousov K.I. Deyatelnostno-ontologicheskaya koncepciya formoobrazovaniya teksta [The activity-ontological concept of the text forming]. Diss d-ra filol nauk [PhD theses]. Orenburg. 2005.
20. Osipov G. et al. Relational-situational method for intelligent search and analysis of scientific publications// Proceedings of the integrating IR technologies for professional search workshop. 2013. p. 57-64.